12.29.08
Entity Special, Take 3
Once again I was all but sure I had it here. But I guess if I didn’t feel that way it wouldn’t be nearly as hilarious that I continue to miss river check / raises.
The button open limper was very loose and passive. The big blind was pretty LAG post flop (as evidenced by his raise of my flop lead), so I was utterly stunned when it got checked through on the end. I figured he’d bet any king, value bet any small pair (e.g., if he raised the flop with 64), and bluff any busted flush draw. The only hands I could really see him checking down were A4 and A2.
I was pretty surprised he didn’t value bet his specific hand (hoping I had some sort of A high, A4, A2, or even A3), but I guess he thought I had a busted draw with no showdown value.
Full Tilt Poker $5/$10 Limit Hold’em – 6 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
Pre Flop: (1.5 SB) Hero is SB with 5
4
3 folds, BTN calls, Hero calls, BB checks
Flop: (3 SB) 3
5
K
(3 players)
Hero bets, BB raises, BTN folds, Hero calls
Turn: (3.5 BB) 6
(2 players)
Hero checks, BB bets, Hero calls
River: (5.5 BB) 5
(2 players)
Hero checks, BB checks
Final Pot: 5.5 BB
Hero shows 5
4
(three of a kind, Fives)
BB shows 6
3
(two pair, Sixes and Fives)
Hero wins 5.3 BB
(Rake: $2.00)
12.28.08
More on moving up
I wanted to add something to the previous post I made about moving up in limits.
If you’ve played poker for even a short period of time you’re probably well aware of the effects of the rake. You probably know that the rake is very high at the micro limits, and even high up to $5/$10 (my records show I’ve paid 2.56 BB/100 at this limit – still quite a bit), after which point there is something of a reprieve. One direct consequence of this is that aspiring players are often encouraged to move up as quickly as possible in order to escape the so-called rake trap. Poker players occasionally wonder if they would be best served by skipping the low limits entirely and trying to jump straight into the mid stakes games.
I would like to propose that this is a poor idea, that it is in fact extremely important to not skip limits. The traditional argument for tackling each limit one at a time is that ‘each limit has something to teach you.’ While I believe that statement has some merit, it is not the primary reason that I feel limits should not be skipped.
Rather, I believe there is some value in struggling at each limit and allowing the rake to eat away at you (while hopefully still winning overall). If you only break even at the micro stakes you will still derive some intangible benefits. Even losing should serve you well as it is good practice for future losses* (which will be significantly larger as you play higher stakes). Hopefully such experiences will cultivate character. Psychological fortitude has a place in the poker player’s repertoire and should be highly valued.
For example, how will a player handle losing $1,000+ in a day? If they are an experienced mid stakes player then they will know this is a fairly commonplace occurrence. In fact, they may not even have to ‘deal with it’ per se since it is well within the realm or normal and expected variance. But a player that never worked their way through the micro and small stakes probably won’t be able to handle it. How can they tolerate losing four figures when they never even got accustomed to losing a couple of hundred dollars? How can they stand the loss when they don’t even have any experience breaking even?
For more, see Tommy Angelo’s website or his excellent book, Elements of Poker.
12.24.08
Happy Holidays!
Whatever you celebrate, I hope you’re having a great time.
My Christmas celebration is already underway, and I really think it’s going to be the best Christmas ever, even though I won’t be with my family (the upside of that is that for the first time in years I’m not traveling this season).
My fiancée and I went climbing this morning and then racked up a $250 grocery bill. So now we’re fully stocked on Christmas goodies, including but not limited to:
chocolate
pizza
cookies (for Santa imo)
chocolate
pretzels
chips
various dips
chocolate
pie
sushi
clementines
chocolate
ice cream
french fries
juice
chocolate
potato skins
chocolate
mozzarella sticks
chocolate
cider
chocolate
crackers and cheese
chocolate, and
chocolate
So now the Christmas itinerary looks about like this:
Hole ourselves up in the apartment for the next few days, drink hot buttered rums and hot chocolate, gorge ourselves more or less constantly, play Settler of Catan: Cities and Knights, and watch the Lord of the Rings trilogy.
12.21.08
Entity Special, Take 2
I’m distraught. I really really really thought I had it here:
Full Tilt Poker $5/$10 Limit Hold’em – 5 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
Pre Flop: (1.5 SB) Hero is CO with 9
A
1 fold, Hero raises, BTN 3-bets, 2 folds, Hero calls
Flop: (7.5 SB) 6
T
3
(2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets, Hero calls
Turn: (4.75 BB) T
(2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets, Hero raises, BTN 3-bets, Hero calls
River: (10.75 BB) J
(2 players)
Hero checks, BTN checks
Final Pot: 10.75 BB
Hero shows 9
A
(a flush, Ace high)
BTN shows A
T
(three of a kind, Tens)
Hero wins 10.45 BB
(Rake: $3.00)
12.20.08
Entity Special, Take 1
As per the tag line of my blog, I am attempting to find the perfect spot to check/raise the river. This effort is inspired by my coach Entity, who is somewhat notorious for employing this play (which tends to makes a person very unpleasant to play against).
To this point I have failed, either watching my opponent check behind, or occasionally getting a the check/raise in, only to find the general consensus is that I should NOT have check/raised (which, while satisfying from a $ perspective leaves me lacking – I strive for the time when it all comes together, I should check/raise, and execute flawlessly).
To that end, this will be the first in what will likely be a very long string of posts in which I show a hand where I attempt to check/raise the river. I fear that this new category of posts will become long, possibly comically so.
Full Tilt Poker $5/$10 Limit Hold’em – 6 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
Pre Flop: (1.5 SB) Hero is SB with A
T
1 fold, MP raises, 2 folds, Hero 3-bets, BB calls, MP calls
Flop: (9 SB) J
6
Q
(3 players)
Hero bets, BB calls, MP calls
Turn: (6 BB) K
(3 players)
Hero bets, BB folds, MP calls
River: (8 BB) 4
(2 players)
Hero requests TIME, Hero checks, MP checks
Final Pot: 8 BB
MP mucks J
A
Hero shows A
T
(a straight, Ace high)
Hero wins 7.7 BB
(Rake: $3.00)
Retrospectively this was not a great attempt. At the time I felt that, given the game dynamic we had developed, villain would value bet any king, queen, or jack on the river. The problem with this is that the chances of them holding a queen or king is reduced significantly by their lack of a raise on the flop or turn respectively (again, our game dynamic and playing history would dictate that these hands put in more action earlier). In the end I think I was trying a bit too hard here and fell victim to fancy play syndrome rather than just making a straight up value bet as I should have.
A flaw in the Game Creation Method
Increasingly almost every poker player I respect as skilled is playing a fair amount of heads up. So I’ve resolved to use the Game Creation (sitting at an empty table in the hopes that poor players will join me) when I can’t find a good table. The objective will be to start slowly incorporating more HUHU into my playing sessions.
I feel like I played pretty expertly during this session:
Full Tilt Poker $5/$10 Limit Hold’em – 2 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
Pre Flop: (1.5 SB) Hero is BTN/SB with A
8
Hero raises, 1 fold
Final Pot: 1 BB
Hero wins 1 BB
Full Tilt Poker $5/$10 Limit Hold’em – 2 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
Pre Flop: (1.5 SB) Hero is BB with 4
2
BTN/SB raises, 1 fold
Final Pot: 1 BB
BTN/SB wins 1 BB
Villain sits out
PygmyHero (in chat): good match
12.19.08
Things that go donk in the night
I have a secret: I love donking. It’s fun because it’s usually unconventional and almost invariably confuses and / or frustrates my opponents. Unfortunately, I don’t often get a lot of opportunities to employ this rather brilliant stratagem because most opponents are aggressive enough that check/raising for value is the superior play.
However, I did play a recent session where I had an abnormal number of good donking opportunities. I thought discussing when and why I donk would be beneficial as (DeathDonkey tells me) the blog’s been a bit lacking in content lately. Generally speaking, I’m looking to donk when I have a hand that wants a bet going in but can’t necessarily rely on someone else to bet for me.
Here are two examples:
Hand 1
Full Tilt Poker $5/$10 Limit Hold’em – 6 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
Pre Flop: (1.5 SB) Hero is SB with 9
7
1 fold, MP calls, 2 folds, Hero calls, BB checks
Flop: (3 SB) T
8
T
(3 players)
Hero checks, BB checks, MP bets, Hero calls, BB folds
Turn: (2.5 BB) 9
(2 players)
Hero bets, MP calls
River: (4.5 BB) 6
(2 players)
Hero bets, MP folds
Final Pot: 4.5 BB
Hero wins 4.3 BB
(Rake: $2.00)
I actually think I made a mistake by not donking the flop. My bet would partially be for value but also because I don’t mind if both opponents fold outright and I win with 9 high (note that they will pretty much always be making a Fundamental Theorem of Poker mistake when they fold to my bet). Also, because there was no pre flop raise I am not at all sure the flop will get bet, and when it gets checked my chances of winning the pot unimproved drop precipitously.
Other benefits of donking are that I get to see how everyone reacts and keep myself in the hand (if I check I could face 2 bets cold, in which case I’d fold in such a small pot). Also, this hand fits in well with my (hopefully) balanced donking range: Tx, 8x, small pocket pairs I didn’t raise pre flop (so maybe 44-22), many combo draws (flush draws, especially with some sort of straight draw and / or overcards, overcard gutshots, especially with a backdoor flush draw, etc.), and a few semi-bluff type hands (e.g., Ax with a backdoor flush draw, K9 with a backdoor flush draw, etc.). I would pretty much never bluff with complete air as I feel the board is too draw friendly for that to be a good play.
The rest of the hand kind of played itself. I feel I have to bet on the turn since the connectedness of the 9 will often scare villain into checking. Also, now that I’ve made a pair I have the best hand here almost always (I’ve overtaken 8x, every reasonable pocket pair he could hold, and all of his random hands), so I need to put a bet in. On the river I improve and obviously need to continue to get value.
Hand 2
Full Tilt Poker $5/$10 Limit Hold’em – 5 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
Pre Flop: (1.5 SB) Hero is BB with 9
Q
UTG calls, 1 fold, BTN calls, SB calls, Hero checks
Flop: (4 SB) 7
J
8
(4 players)
SB checks, Hero checks, UTG checks, BTN bets, SB folds, Hero calls, UTG calls
Turn: (3.5 BB) Q
(3 players)
Hero bets, UTG calls, BTN calls
River: (6.5 BB) 6
(3 players)
Hero bets, UTG folds, BTN calls
Final Pot: 8.5 BB
BTN mucks J
A
Hero shows 9
Q
(a pair of Queens)
Hero wins 8.2 BB
(Rake: $3.00)
On the flop I don’t really see much value in betting my marginal hand (though it is important to note that if a T rolls off I make the nut straight and beat rather than chop 9x) 4 ways in such a small pot. I think I’m better off checking and trying to gather information based on my opponent’s actions. At the same time, I’m clearly not folding for one bet to a button who could easily be stabbing after no one shows interest in the pot.
On the turn I improve to what is very likely the best hand, so I want to get value and protect it. The best way to accomplish this is to bet out since I don’t know if button will bet the turn. Since I feel he could easily be stabbing on the flop there are many hands he could hold here that often won’t necessarily bet again on the turn (Tx, 9x, 8x, 7x, 65, a small pocket pair, flush draws, A high, and air). Also, since he overlimped pre flop he may even be passive enough to check Jx here. Note that I’m making this statement based more on what I perceive as his hand range rather than how ’scary’ the Q is to him (the one exception may be being in the case where he holds Jx and checks it back).
The river’s pretty much a brick, so given that I was only called on the turn clearly a value bet is the play. That said, I think it’s important to be aware of how the 6 affects the villain’s hand range. 54, 86, and 76 overtake our hand. While the latter two are possible holdings, the first is very unlikely as a villain would have to be pretty bad to continue to peel to an undercard gutshot. However, the news isn’t all bad because 96 and 65 now may have made enough of a hand to throw in a crying call.
12.18.08
lol skype-aments
I’ve been spending a bit more time talking to fellow DeucesCracked members who are regulars in the games I’m playing. This can be strategically invaluable, as the following conversations will no doubt reveal.
Conversation One
Here we were discussing a very tight regular in the Full Tilt Poker games. I’m going to hide their name, but if you play a lot of $5/$10 you can probably guess who it is.
PygmyHero: [player name] – such a jopke
Nfinity: yes
PygmyHero: wish I could sit with me and 5 of him
PygmyHero: just raise every hand and make 75 BB /100
Nfinity: heh
…
PygmyHero: btw I beat level 5
PygmyHero: but barely
PygmyHero: didn’t get much further though
Nfinity: pick up a P power up
Nfinity: get plasma
Nfinity: dont worry about any other powerups besides missiles
Conversation Two
jaybeastie: I am “towelfish” on full tilt
jaybeastie: just so you know ![]()
PygmyHero: haha – I HATE Towelie.
jaybeastie: ![]()
PygmyHero: Maybe I should get one of those t-shirts
jaybeastie: yoou got the t-shirt?
jaybeastie: haha
PygmyHero: haha
PygmyHero: Oh man, it would be SOOO sweet if you saved up your FTP points…
PygmyHero: and got the custom avatar…
jaybeastie: omg
jaybeastie: ^^
PygmyHero: and it WAS Towelie!
PygmyHero: You for SURE need to make that like next year’s goal.
jaybeastie: great idea
PygmyHero: It would tilt me SOOOO hard at the tables.
PygmyHero: I would for sure go angry elephant…
…
PygmyHero: Just spam the chat constantly…
PygmyHero: Anyone wanna get high?
PygmyHero: You should always bring a towel…
PygmyHero: A DC vid in the making to be sure.
jaybeastie: ![]()
jaybeastie: i <3 this idea
jaybeastie: its soo great
12.17.08
Fun Hand
I haven’t posted any hands in a while, so I thought this would be fun. By the way, I snap called the river with the second worse possible flush.
Villain then proceeded to go on tilt and raise/cap 87o on the button against a tight small blind 3-bet, make a ridiculous turn semi-bluff raise when he picked up a double gutter and then followed through on the river with an 8 high bluff bet.
Full Tilt Poker $5/$10 Limit Hold’em – 6 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
Pre Flop: (1.5 SB) Hero is CO with 3
3
2 folds, Hero raises, 2 folds, BB calls
Flop: (4.5 SB) Q
7
8
(2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, BB calls
Turn: (3.25 BB) 6
(2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks
River: (3.25 BB) 9
(2 players)
BB bets, Hero calls
Final Pot: 5.25 BB
BB shows J
T
(a straight, Queen high)
Hero shows 3
3
(a flush, Queen high)
Hero wins 5.05 BB
(Rake: $2.00)
12.15.08
Policy on Results and Downswings
Given some of my recent results (not good), I thought this might be a germane topic. I’m not really going to elaborate on the nature and extent of my downswing as I don’t think that would be healthy for me or beneficial to the reader. Besides, everything I’m experiencing is well within the extent of normal variance. Rather, I think recent events provide a good opportunity to discuss some of the ways I cope with variance and downswings as I believe my approach has a few unusual aspects.
My Significant Other
It would be only natural that I expect my fiancée to help me if I were doing just about anything else in life (household chores for example). But finding ways for her to ‘help’ with poker is a bit more difficult as my poker knowledge exceeds hers and I can click the buttons just fine by myself (thank you very much).
So she and I came up with some rules that are designed to help me de-emphasize results:
- After a session she is not allowed to ask me how it went or how I did (in terms of dollars and cents). She is, however, allowed to ask me how I played (as that question is not about results).
- In fact, she is not entitled to know my results at any time. I can volunteer information if I so choose, but it is entirely at my discretion. The purpose here is not to deny her information or hide results from her, but simply to relieve the pressure of needing to tell her things like ‘I’m up for the week,’ as doing so would almost invariably focus on time periods that are too short. Besides, she figures much of it out anyway as she’s generally aware when I move up in limits (because I’ll tell her about hands or whatever), at which point she, being the clever little creature that she is, usually deduces I did at least okay at the previous limit.
- This is quite possibly the most important one: she is NOT to enable me if I lose and act up. After playing poker for a while I noticed that when losing I sometimes behave like a small child: when no one is around I just sit more or less placidly and move on to the next hand. But when my fiancée is in the apartment I may make exasperated sighing noises (in a pathetic and obvious attempt to garner attention and sympathy). To counteract this we try to schedule some time when I can play poker and she is not in the apartment. And when we are both home she is to ignore my reactions under all circumstances (because the worst possible thing would be for her to reinforce and reward this type of behavior by asking what happened).
Language
I’m into semantics. I believe words have very specific connotations. The reason we have so many words that are synonyms or very closely related is so that we can communicate what we mean very precisely. Because of this, I believe the words we choose convey much information about our mindset.
Therefore I have forbidden myself from using a number of words that are common in the poker lexicon. For example, I am not allowed to describe a poker hand (or any aspect of poker) as “sick,” or “gross.” This isn’t just so I don’t sound like one more angst-ridden 20-something poker player who can’t handle variance (though that is a benefit). It’s because the hand I played was in fact not sick or gross. It was completely normal and an expected result some (even if very small) percentage of the time.
Another really common example would be any variation of, “I run so bad.” Again, I just don’t believe this is true (the truth is that I run so normal). Telling myself otherwise, that my results are somehow abnormal, would only hinder my ability to deal with variance and stunt my psychological fortitude.